To the commenter who claimed the BNP were hypocritical in admiting Jews i) they avoid the label of anti-semitism thus ii) Jews are White-ish, although it is debatable.

To argue that a black man and a white man are different, or are not different, is to miss the point: humans, supposedly, share around 57% of their genes with a CABBAGE, but the only humans that share 100% of their genes are identical twins. Everyone is different, but every human being is still pretty damn alike: to talk of a British genotype is just scientific mumbo-jumbo. Especially since the jury is still definitely out on the proportionate genetic and environmental contributions to identity.

The BNP’s policies are not consistent: they say they have Jewish members, by which I shall have to assume they mean people who are racially Jewish rather than converts in later life; that being the case, they’re no more indigenously British than the Asian and African communities which the BNP is so in favour of removing (partially or completely) from Britain.

Their website’s definition of ‘indigenous’ is correct but to apply it to Britain 1000 years ago is again, missing the point. Britain was not ‘created as a nation’ around 1008 (or even 1066), and in many senses never has been. We have at various points of history since then allowed, nay encouraged, peoples from different cultures into the country. The slave-trade era is one which everybody would wish to forget, but it was the “indigenous” British who brought African slaves en masse to the British isles.

The most recent Parlimentary change to any kind of “British identity” was in 1922, when most of Ireland separated. Of course, by this time you would have seen plenty of people of African origin in the country, and no doubt also Asians and other cultures. If you have to pick a time for ‘indigenous’ to apply from, then 1922 is the only logical one – the kingdom changed it’s NAME then, after all, and with it its identity.

Last point. Yes, it’s cultures that clash, not races, and Britain does have a variety of issues relating to this at the moment, due to the influx of different cultures. But cultures do NOT replace each other – they combine. Give me any example of a cultural replacement in this country, and I will prove that actually, elements of both cultures were fused together, under the same or a different name. This happens in any country that permits immigration.

Along with these fusions, culture changes, on its own, all the time, building on what has gone before. So you pretty soon can’t extract the elements of one part of a cultural fusion without the whole kaboodle falling down around you. Where does culture begin and end? If you were to remove the majority of Asian people from Britain, would you also make curries and stir-fries illegal? Ban all takeaways other than “traditional” chippies? Would you take it even further and forbid, for example, study of yoga, tai chi, and eastern philosophy – perhaps burn all the books that detail such things? Unless you do this, you really won’t have separated the culture out from the “indigenous” British culture, I can assure you. If you do do it, you’ll find that Britain suddenly has some pretty serious problems.

We all come from Africa, unless you believe in that ‘creation by an unseen entity ‘ nonsense. But we’ve moved on since then, peoples were sufficiently distant from one another that they developed different ways of doing things ( that is the true definition of culture, simplistic but nevertheless true).

Quote
” There are legimitate concerns about multicultralism, immigration, national identity etc but racists do not deal with these, they remove rationalism from arguments and replace sensible thought with irrational disdain. ”

Thats’s correct, I have the same concerns but I am not racist ( a term often confused with “bad person” ) I have friends from Mauritius, Africa, India, and many other places. I am however a “culturist”, lets see if we can get this new term accepted and subsequently vilified !.
I don’t want to wake up one day and find that the law has changed and that for forgetting to file a tax return now results in a foot being amputated. That’s the kind of difference in culture I’m talking about.
Yes it’s an extreme example but subtlety is lost on the brainwashed generation of the last 20 years or so.
Races don’t clash, cultures do.
The inhabitants of any land define it’s culture, there’s a good article on the BNP website about how one culture replaces another, well worth reading.

As for the BNP Wives program, it was meant to show them in a bad light.
Nobody will ever agree 100% with any party’s manifesto but the BNP do have more valid points than the rest.
The media are not allowed to show the BNP in a favourable light, the media is owned by foreigners who in turn own this government.

Take for example Richard Littlejohn, in his Daily Mail column he complains about the same issues that the BNP do, he sounds like a BNP supporter but every now and then he has to make negative comments about them, just plain odd or … ?

I would suggest to anyone, take a long look at the BNP website, watch the BNPTV clips and then decide if it is a party of “fat old women” or thugs.

You may think that the members are all completely misguided but theres no denying that most of them could be your neighbour who you share power tools/holidays/wife with

It is possible to hold an incorrect opinion, if the conclusions on which the opinion is based are a result of faulty reasoning. This is the case with all racist thinking.

Also, you can’t compare disliking multi-culturalism with disliking foodstuffs – they are completely different. You may dislike coffee becuase it has a bitter taste and you are genetically disposed to dislike bitter tastes. Presumably you don’t dislike other cultures because of the way they taste and you don’t dislike coffee because of its colour.

It is interesting to note that you haven’t mentioned why you aren’t a fan of multi-culturalism. I’m jumping to a few conclusions here but I would say that you are incorrect in disliking multiculturalism. As I’ve mentioned, you can hold an invalid opinion if that opinion is formed as a result of poor logic and reasoning

There are legimitate concerns about multicultralism, immigration, national identity etc but racists do not deal with these, they remove rationalism from arguments and replace sensible thought with irrational disdain.

Multi-racialism is a fun topic. I’m thinking that when you say multi-racial what you actually mean is ‘people who have a different skin colour than me’. The fact is that we are all multi-racial. It is possible to trace one’s roots by looking at genes – I would like to do this myself but it costs money. There are very few people in this country who are descended exclusively from native ‘British’ stock – even if there ever was such a thing. How would you feel if you had the test done and you discovered that in the past your ancestors came from India, Africa or the Russian Steppes? Would you still be a big racist?

Also, I’m not self-righteous, I’m right.

It is merely your OPINION that they are wrong.

Personally I don’t want to live in a multiracial, multicultural society. This preference makes me neither right nor wrong…it is merely a personal choice; as is your hatred of the BNP and its policies.

For example, I cannot stand cinnamon or coffee; this does not mean that I think cinnamon or coffee are wrong, that enjoying cinnamon or coffee is wrong, that people who enjoy or produce cinnamon or coffee are in anyway wrong or evil.

You do not approve of the BNP and its policies; that is your right. I generally do approve of the BNP and its policies and that is my right too. Both our rights to support or not support the BNP are equal, you are in no way superior to me because of your political beliefs, and taking such a self-righteous stance merely diminishes your argument.